Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General Information
Full Name
The China Ocean Shipping Company
vs
Pacific International Lines
website
Www.cosco.com
vs
Www.pilship.com
Type
Public(state-owned Enterprise)
vs
Private
Country
China
vs
Singapore
Headquarter
Beijing, China
vs
Cecil Street
Cecil Street, Singapore
Year Founded
1961
vs
1967
Parent Company
Cosco Group
vs
Pil Group
Subsidiaries
Cosco Pacific,
Cosco International Holdings,
China Cosco Holdings,
China Cosco Holdings,
China International Marine Containers,
China International Marine Containers,
Cosco Corporation (singapore),
Cosco Container Lines Japan
vs
Singamas Container
Service Available
Area Served
Asia,
Europe,
Mediterranean,
Africa,
North/south America,
Australia/new Zealand,
Red Sea/gulf,
Middle East
vs
Asia,
Europe,
Mediterranean,
Africa,
North/south America,
Australia/new Zealand,
Red Sea/gulf,
Middle East
Destination (Countries)
160
vs
Number of service locations/ports
vs
210
Offices Available (Countries)
50
vs
Operation
Total Capacity (TEU)
699,905
vs
288,079
Total Vessels
154
vs
140
Largest Container Ship (TEU)
13,100
vs
6 606
Revenue in 2011 (billion)
$88.9
vs
Compare COSCO vs PIL Shipping Container Companies
cancel